نوع مقاله : بلاغی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری زبان و ادبیات فارسی، گرایش ادبیات غنایی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 استاد گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Rhetorical science, as one of the three branches of eloquence studies, has long been recognized as an independent field. Given that the nature of literature is inherently creative and generates new techniques and ornaments alongside the poet’s art and creativity, it can be argued that in many cases, rhetorical science (the study of poetic virtues) has lagged behind. The teaching and learning of this field can also sometimes be problematic. Identifying its weaknesses and striving to address them is an unavoidable necessity. This article, using an analytical-descriptive method, addresses one of the shortcomings of this science: the incorrect classification of rhetoric into verbal and semantic, which has become an inseparable part of this field for centuries. It seems that contrary to the opinion of the vast majority of authors of rhetorical books, the definition and differentiation between these two categories are neither logical nor scientific. Consequently, in some cases, it is difficult to correctly determine whether a particular ornament or technique belongs to verbal or semantic rhetoric based on this classification. Because sometimes we encounter industries in which both words and meaning play a role at the same time, and sometimes devices have been mentioned which their rhetorical value does not depend on the rhythm of words and meaning, but rather on its eye-catching appearance, more than anything else, has caused literary and artistic enjoyment.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله