Basic Topicalization in Manteq-al-Tayr

Document Type : Grammatical-rhetorical

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature , Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

10.22091/jls.2024.9948.1552

Abstract

One of the important components in Halliday's systematic role-oriented linguistics is the category of subject-predicate, by means of which the process of initialization and construction of old and new information can be investigated in any text, including Manteq-al- Tayr. Therefore, with the descriptive-analytical method, we are trying to investigate the problem of simple and compound primers according to Michael Halliday's approach in Manteq-al-Tayr. The purpose of the research is to investigate the frequency of the most types of initiators, scrambling, and to explain the verbal purposes hidden in the depth of the textual structure of Manteq-al-Tayr. The results of the research show that the percentage of multiple themes is more than simple themes, which indicates the affinity of the text with the speech, and also, Attar has used all the capacities to facilitate readers' understanding. In the simple themes, the poet has used the initial construction of the verb, more than other initial constructions of object, complement, adjective, interrogative and adverb, which has made the construction of information clauses stand out and marked. Among multiple themes, textual primers have a higher frequency than interpersonal primers. Textual primers have played a significant role in the textual coherence of Manteq-al- Tayr.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. ‘Alaei, M. (2009). ˝Barresi-ye Fara Naghsh-e Matni-ye Ketab-ha-ye Darsi-ye ‘Oloom-e Ensani Sazman-e Motale’e va Tadvin (Samt)̋. Pazhoohesh va negaresh-e Kotob-e Daneshgahi. No. 22. Pp. 92- 113. DOI: https:/20.1001.1.26767503.1388.14.22.6.2.
  2. Algoneh Jonghani, M. (2016). ˝Tahlil-e Ensejam-e Matni-ye Qazali az Hafez, bar asase Sakht-e Mobtadayi˝. Jostarhaye Zabani. No. 7. Pp. 265- 290. DOI: http:/lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-2478-fa.html.
  3. Anvari, H. & H. Ahmadi Givi. (2000). Dastoor-e Zaban-e Farsi2. Tehran: Samt.
  4. Anvari, H. & Y. ‘Ali .(2012). Dastoor Zaban-e Farsi 1. Tehran: Daneshgahe Payam-e Noor.
  5. ‘Attar Neyshaboori, F. (2010). Mantegh-ol Tayr. Tashih-e Mohammad Reza Shafi’I Kadkani.Tehran: Sokhan.
  6. Baker, M.(1992). In other Words: A Course on Translation. London: Routledge.
  7. Eggins, S.(2004). Introduction to Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publications.
  8. Fahimnia, F. (2010). “Towsif va Tahlil-e Naghshgerayane-ye Aghazgar az Manzar-e Rooykard-e Halliday dar Matn-e Ketabhaye Farsi , Enshaye Daneshamozan-e Dabestan˝. Zaban va Zabanshenasi. No. 12. Pp. 41-59. [In Persian]
  9. Fotoohi, M. (2011). Sabkshenasi-ye Nazariye-ha, Rooykard-ha va Ravesh-ha. Tehran: Sokhan.
  10. Ghanbari, D. & N. Oskoyi & ‘A, Hejabi Kahjoogh. (2022). ˝Tahlil-e Sakhtari va Ghoftemani-ye Aghazgarha dar Fotovvat Nameye Najm-ol-din Zarkoob, bar Asase Nazariye-ye Halliday̋. Jostarname-ye Adabiyyat-e Tatbighi. 6(21). Pp. 1-24. DOI: https:/10.30495/rpcl.2022.697243.
  11. Givon, Talmi. (1984). Syntax: A Functional- Typological Introduction, Vol 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  12. Halliday, M. (1967). ˝Notes on transitivity & theme in English: Part 2˝. Journal of Linguistics. No. 3. Pp. 199- 244.
  13. Halliday, M. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edvard Arnold Publication. Halliday , M. (2002). On Grammar. London & New York: Continuum.
  14. Halliday, M. & Ch. Matthiessen. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3 Edition. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.
  15. Jabri, S. & P. Fayyaz Manesh. (2010). ̋Karkardhaye Zibayi Shenasi-ye Pishayi-ye Fe’l dar Qazal-e Sa’di˝. Pazhoohesh-e Zaban va Adabiyyat-e Farsi. No. 18. Pp. 113- 141. [In Persian]
  16. Kazemi, F. (2013). ̋Aghazgare Laye-ei, Mafhoomi Taze dar Naghshgarayi˝. Pazgooheshhaye Zabanshenakhti dar Zabanhaye Khareji. No. 2. Pp. 313- 350. DOI: https:/10.22059/jflr.2013.57275.
  17. Khanlari, P. (2003). Dastoor Tarikhi-ye Zaban-e Farsi. Tehran: Toos.
  18. Khayam poor, ‘A. (2005). Dastoor Zaban-e Farsi. Tabriz: Sotoode.
  19. Lambrecht, K .(1994). Information Structure & Sentence Form. London: Cambridge University Press.
  20. laynz, J. (2012). Daramadi bar Ma’nishenasi. Tarjomeye Koorosh Safavi. Tehran: ‘Elmi.
  21. Mansoori, M. (2010). ˝Naghsh-e Mahdoodiyat-ha va Ghabeliyathaye Zabani dar Sheklgiriy-e Adabiyyat-e Manzoom: Tahlil-e Ash’ari az Hafez va Shekspiyer̋. Pazhoohesh-e Adabiyyat-e Mo’aser-e Jahan. No. 60. Pp. 93- 112. [In Persian]
  22. Matthiessen, Ch .(1992). Advances in Systematic Linguistics, Recent Theory & Practice. London: Pinter.
  23. Mo’ezipoor, F. (2019). ̋Ghalebhaye Nahvi- Sakht-e Ettela’i-ye Maf’ool-e Mostaghim dar Zaban-e Farsi˝. Jostarhaye Zabani. 4(52). Pp. 173- 204. DOI: https:/20.1001.1.23223081.1398.10.4.13.1
  24. Mohajer, M. & M. Nabavi. (2014). Be Sooye ZabanShenasi She’r. Tehran: Agah.
  25. Rasekh Mahand, M. (2006). ˝Ertebat-e Ghalb-e Nahvi va Ta’kid dar Zaban-e Farsi. Name-ye Farhanghestan. No. 2. Pp. 20-33. [In Persian]
  26. Rezayi, V. (2004). ˝Zaban-e Me’yar Chist va Che Vizhegihayi Darad?̋. Name-ye Farhanghestan. 3(23). Pp. 20-35. [In Persian]
  27. Sarli, N. & B. Bagheri & Sh. Sadeghi. (2019). ̋Balaghat-e Sakhthaye Nahvi-ye Neshanedar dar Ash’ar-e Nimayi-ye Akhavan-e Sales. Motale’at-e Zabani va Balaghi. No. 19. Pp. 233-264. DOI: https:/10.22075/jlrs.2018.15884.1310.
  28. Sasani, F. (2010). Ma’nakavi va be Sooye Neshane shenasi-ye Ejtema’i. Tehran: ‘Elm.
  29. Shafi’I Kadkani, M. (1989). Moosighi-ye She’r. Tehran: Agah.
  30. Thompson, E. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
  31. Vafayi , ‘A.’A. (2013). Dastoor-e Twosifi, bar Asas-e Vahedhaye Zaban-e Farsi. Tehran: Sokhan.
  32. Vahidiyan Kamyar, T. (2007). Dastoor Zaban-e Farsi (1). Tehran: Samt.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Rhetoric and Grammar Studies
Volume 13, Issue 23
December 2023
Pages 183-203

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics