The Rhetorical Functions of Adjectives in Qeysar Aminpour’s Poetry Based on Robert Dixon’s Semantic Model

Document Type : Grammatical-rhetorical

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Arak University, Arak, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of English Language and Literature, Arak University, Arak, Iran

10.22091/jls.2023.9733.1531

Abstract

Adjective is one of the three main elements of language that play a significant part in producing and conveying textual meaning. Robert Dixon, a contemporary English linguist, has provided a semantic typology of adjectives that consists of thirteen types. Adopting a descriptive-analytic methodology, the present study investigates the semantic and rhetorical functions of adjectives in the collected poems of Qeysar Aminpour according to Dixon’s model to see how the use of adjectives in the poems is related to the evolution of the poet’s attitudes. The findings of this research show that, apart from their primary semantic functions, adjectives and adjectival phrases play various significant aesthetic and rhetorical roles in Aminpour’s poems in creating music, poetic imagery, and such tropes as metaphor, simile, pun, allusion, and synaesthesia. It is also demonstrated that throughout Aminpour’s poetic career the frequency and functions of adjectives noticeably changed in accordance with significant changes in his attitudes toward both poetry and society. According to the data collected and analyzed in this study, four types of adjectives, i.e., speed, similarity, difficulty, and age, do not serve any rhetorical function in his poems, whereas the highest number of rhetorical functions is fulfilled by adjectives of physical properties, color, human propensity, and quality. Moreover, in terms of usage of adjectives and the number of their rhetorical functions the two volumes entitled “Sudden Mirrors” and “All Flowers Are Sunflowers,” written in the middle of his poetic career, are richer than the other two volumes of his poetry and the higher rate of using synaesthesia and pun in them signals the poet’s introversion and romantic mood in that stage. On the other hand, the higher number of adjectives of color and value in his first volume of poetry (“The Morning’s Breath”) accords with the poet’s mood during the Iran-Iraq War.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aminpoor, Q. (2009). Majmoo’e-ye kamel-e Ash’ar (1359-1385). Tehran: Morvarid.
Bakhtin, M. (1994). Sodaye mokaleme, khande, Azadi. Tarjomeye Mohammad Pooyandeg. Tehran: Arest.
Croft, W. (2009). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Dehrami, M. (2015). Naghshhaye honari-ye sefat dar Ijad-e zaban-e Adabi, tasvirsazi, va keyfiyat-e ‘Atefeh dar she’r-e Shamloo. Zibayishenasi-ye Adabi. 12(23). Pp. 27-46. [In Persian]
Dixon, R. M. W. (1982). Where have all the adjectives gone? Mouton.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2006). Adjective classes in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. 5-49.
Farabi, M. (1987). Ketab ol-she’r (dar Al-manteghiyat-e Lel-Farabi). Tahghigh-e Mohammadtaghi Daneshpazhooh. Vol. 1. Qom: Maktabatol Ayatollah Mar’ashi Najafi.
Fazilat, M. (2006). Ma’nashenasi va ma’ani dar zaban va Adabiyyat. Kermanshah: Entesharat-e Daneshgah-e Razi. Fotoohi Rodma’jani, M. (2008). Seh seda, seh rang, seh sabk dar she’r-e Qeysar Aminpoor. Adab pazhoohi. 2(5). Pp. 9-30. [In Persian]
Hasan Li, K. (2004). Goonehaye no’avari dar she’r-e mo’aser-e Iran. Tehran: Sales.
Hegel. G. F. W. (1992). Moghaddame-ei bar Zibayishenasi. Tarjomeye Mahmood ‘Ebadiyan. Tehran: Avaze.
Jam’I az Nevisandegan. (2007). Romantism (Majmoo’e Maghalat-e Faslnameye Falsafi, Adabi, Farhangi Arghanoon 2). 2th Edition. Tehran: Sazman-e Chap va Entesharat-e Vezarat-e Farhang va Ershad-e Eslami.
Khayyampoor, ‘A. (2005). Dastoor-e zaban-e farsi. 14th Edition. Tehran: Sotoode.
Kordbacheh, L.; Aghahoseini, H. & S.M. Hashemi. (2017). Karbord-e sefat dar she’r-e mo’aser. Fonoon-e Adabi. 9(2). Pp. 1-16. [In Persian]
Leech, G. (2008). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. Longman.
Lyons, J. (2012). Daramadi bar ma’nishenasi-ye zaban. Tarjomeye Koorosh Safavi. Tehran: ‘Elmi.
Majlesi, M.B. (2009). Hayat al-Gholoob (Tarikh-e Emaman). Tarjomeye Seyyed Ali Emamiyan. Vol. I. Qom: Soroor. Mirsadeghi, J. & M. Mirsadeghi. (2016). Vazhename-ye honar-e dastan nevisi: Farhag-e Tafsili-ye Estelahhaye Adabiyyat-e Dastani. 3th Edition. Tehran: Ketab-e Mahnaz.
Nooraghayi, A. (2010). ‘Adad, namad, Ostooreh. 2th Edition. Tehran: Afkar.
Perrine, L. (2000). She’r va ‘Anaser-e she’r. Tarjomeye Gholamreza Solgi. Tehran: Rahnama.
Poornamdariyan, T. (2002). Safar dar meh: Ta’ammoli dar she’r-e Ahmad Shamloo. Tehran: Negah.
Shafi’i Kadkani, M.R. (1991). Sovar-e khiyal dar she’r-e farsi. Tehran: Agah.
Shafi’i Kadkani, M.R. (2007). Moosighi-ye she’r. Tehran: Agah.
Short, M. (2013). Exploring the language of poems, plays, and prose. Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2010). Motale’ati dar tahlil-e Goftman, az Dastoor-e Matn ta Goftemankavi-ye Enteghadi. Tarjomeye Gorooh-e Motarjeman. Virasteye Mehran Mohajer & Mohammad Nabavi. 2th Edition. Tehran: Vezarat-e Farhang va Ershad-e Eslami, Markaz-e Ettela’at va Tahghighat-e Resane.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Rhetoric and Grammar Studies
Volume 13, Issue 23
December 2023
Pages 160-182

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics