Rhetorical-action (Bourdieusian) reading of Morgh-e-Anjir, pygmalion and Seda-Khone by GholamHossein Sa’edi

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 * Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student of Persian Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22091/jls.2022.7787.1357

Abstract

The rhetorical and sociological criticism are two writing tools available to literature researchers. If we can provide a methodological and purposeful relationship between these two types of criticism, the narrow boundary between sociology of literature and sociological criticism becomes more clear. Meanwhile the dynamism and fluidity of writing tools are strengthened and the capabilities of author and the capacities of his/her writing are more tangibly discovered. The main question of current research is how relevant and discussable the relationship between rhetorical and sociological criticism in literary research is. And essentially how can we can achieve the dynamism and fluidity of critique through this path. In the current study, we tried to apply mixed method (basic and applied researches with quantitative and qualitative focuses) coupled with library research on three less-known stories of Gholamhossein Saa’edi (Morgh-e-Anjir, Pygmalion and Seda-Khone), to identify the boundary between sociology of literature and sociological criticism in a practical manner. In addition, a methodological relationship is created between rhetorical (knowledge semantics, expression and prosody) and sociological criticism (Pierre Bourdieu’s action). Overall, Research findings indicate that 1)Using the knowledge of rhetoric, one can understand the habits of people, their cultural capital and position in social space, 2) As soon as there are changes in the cultural capital and position of individuals, purposeful changes take place in their rhetoric. 3) With regard to this, not only the literariness of the story is examined, but also the functionality and dynamics of literariness are explained 4) It is also possible to figure out the abilities of a writer like GholamHossein Saa’edi who delicately writes and gives a rhetorical color to sentences. This research could be an introduction to new research in literature.

Keywords

References

Ahmadnezhad, K. (2006). Ma’ani va Bayan. 2th Edition. Tehran: Zavvar.
Alavi Moghaddam, M. & R. Ashrafzadeh. (2016). Ma’ani va Bayan. 13th Edition. Tehran: Samt.
Anvari, H. (2011). Farhang-e kenayat-e sokhan. 2th Edition. Tehran: Sokhan.
Baghinezhad, A & N. Alizadeh. (2015). Ta’ammoli dar Adabiyyat-e emrooz 2. Tehran: Bongah-e Tarjome va Nashr-e Ketab-e Parseh.
Bon Howitz, P. (2017). Darshayi az jame’eshenasi’e Pierre Bourdieu. Tarjome-ye Jahangir Jahangiri & Hasan Poorsafir. 3th Edition. Tehran: Agah.
Bourdieu, P. (2014). Amoozesh-e Atefi-ye fluober. Tarjome-ye Yousef Abazari. Arqanon. No 9 &10. PP. 77-112.
Ebrahimi, N. (2017). Bara’at-e estehlal ya khosh’aghazi dar adabiyyat-e dastani. Tehran: Roozbahan. Esfandiyarpoor, H. (2009). ‘Aroosan-e sokhan. 3th Edition. Tehran: Ferdows.
Fakoohi, N. (2002). Tarikh-e Andisheh va nazariye-haye Ensanshenasi. Tehran: Ney.
Fakoohi, N. (2017). Bourdieu va Meydan-e Daneshgahi. Tehran: Pazhooheshkadeye Motale’at-e Farhangi va Ejtema’i.
Ghasemi, R. (2009). Ma’ani va Bayan-e tatbighi. Tehran: Ferdows.
Grenfell, M. (2014). Mafahim-e kelidi-ye Pierre Bourdieu. Tarjome-ye Mohammad Mehdi Labibi. 2th edition. Tehran: Afkar.
Ha’eri, M & Others. (2012). Naghd-e Balaghi-ye ‘Ash’ar-e Sonnati-ye Nima. Pazhooheshname-ye Naghd-e Adabi. Years 1. No 2. Pp. 106-87.
Homayi, J. (2012). Fonoon-e balaghat va sana’at-e adabi. 31th edition. Tehran: Homa.
Makaryk, I. (2006). Daneshnameye Nazariyehaye adabi-ye mo’aser. Tarjome-ye Mehran Mohajer & Mohammadmahdi Labibi. 2th edition. Tehran: Agah.
Mohammadi, J. & Others. (2012). Monasebat-e sarmayeye farhangi v sabk-e zendegi. jame’eshenasi Iran.Years 13. No 4. Pp. 1-33.
Momtaz, F. (2004). Mo’arrefi-ye mafhoom-e tabaghe az didgahe Bourdieu. Pazhooheshnameye ‘Oloom-e Ensani. No 32-31. PP. 149-160.
Parastesh. Sh. (2014). Ravayat-e naboodi-ye nab; Tahlil-e Bourdieuyi-ye Boof-e koor dar Meydan-e Adabi-ye Iran. 2th Edition. Tehran: Sales.
Payandeh, H. (2016). Jaygahe jame’eshenasi-ye Adabiyyat dar naqd-e Adabi-ye mo’aser. Website Anjoman-e jame’eshenasi-ye Iranian: www.isa.org.ir.
Riters, G. (2015). Nazariye-ye jame’eshenasi. Tarjome-ye Hooshang Nayebi. 3th Edition. Tehran: Ney.
Sa’edi, Gh. (2017). Ashoftehalan-e bidarbakht. 3th Edition. Tehran: Negah.
Sa’edi, Gh. (2019). Dar sarache-ye dabbaghan. Gerdavarde-ye Hamid Tabrizi. Tehran: Bongah-e Tarjome va Nashr-e Ketab-e Parseh.
Salehi Amiri, S.R & R. Sepehrnia. (2015). olgooye Erteghaye sarmayeye farhangi dar iran . Tehran: Ghoghnoos.
Shamisa, S. (2007). Negahi taze be badi’. 3th edition. Tehran: Mitra.
Shamisa, S. (2013). Bayan. 2th edition. Tehran: Mitra.
Shamisa, S. (2014) . Ma’ani. 4th edition. Tehran: Mitra.
Sharifi, M. (2016). Farhange adabiyyat-e mo’aser. Tehran: Asim.
Soleimani, A & M. Mehravaran. (2019). Naghd-e Balaghi-ye She’r-e Mashrooteh. Pazhoohesh-haye Dastoori va Balaghi (‘Oloom-e Adabi-ye sabegh). Years 9. No 16. Pp. 167-205.
Stones, R. (2000). Motefakkerane bozorge jame’eshenasi (Great sociological thinkers). Translated by Mehrdad Mirdamadi. Tehran: Markaz.
Wellek, R. & A, Warren. (2011). Nazariye-ye adabiyyat. Tarjome-ye Zia Movahed & Parviz Mohajer. 3th edition. Tehran: Niloofar.
Zolfaghari, D & Mohammadibadr, N. (2010). Naghd-e Balaghi-ye Beyt-e ma’roofi az Shahnameh. Kohanname-ye adab-e parsi. Years 1. No 2. Pp. 15-27.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Rhetoric and Grammar Studies
Volume 11, Issue 20
February 2022
Pages 195-230

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics